National Patient Safety Movement
Together we can promote safety & accountability in healthcare
- Free to join
- Real-time updates
- Mission Driven
- Taylor Nicole Jenkins
December 31, 1997 - March 22, 2023
Although medical experts concluded that reckless medical negligence and neglect caused Taylor’s death, Florida’s “Free Kill” law caps the value of her life at $0 due to her age and family status, making it financially impossible to hold the hospital and physicians accountable.
The wrongdoers faced no consequences, their medical malpractice insurer dodged a claim, the costs for wrongful death were shifted to the American public, and there is no transparent record of what happened. Meanwhile, our family lives with the consequences every single day.
- Our Mission
Restoring Safety & Accountability in Healthcare
- Your Voice Is Needed
How You Can Help Advance Patient Safety
Stay Informed
Receive updates on legislative developments, patient safety issues, and opportunities to stay informed. We'll only send meaningful updates.
Spread Awareness
Share Taylor's story and help raise awareness about patient safety and healthcare accountability. Every share helps educate others.
Advocacy Resources
Access information, resources, and updates related to legislation affecting patient safety and healthcare accountability.
Connect Families
You may know a family already living with this injustice. Connect them with our resources, community, and advocacy support.
Legislative Updates
“Free Kill” law and other laws, policies, and efforts aimed at improving patient safety and accountability in healthcare.
Support Our Mission
Support patient safety education, public awareness initiatives, family resources, and healthcare accountability efforts.
- Florida Statute 768.21(8)
Restore Accountability in Healthcare
Florida’s “Free Kill” law creates a legal category of people whose lives are worth less under the law. If a victim of medical negligence is 25 or older, unmarried, and without minor children, their family cannot recover non-economic damages — even when negligence is confirmed and fatal.
The Medical Licensing Board
The Florida Department of Health’s Division of Medical Quality Assurance, Florida’s medical licensing board, closes ~97% of complaints submitted. Even in cases involving serious patient harm, proven medical malpractice, or deaths ruled homicide, disciplinary action is often not taken. The Department simply does not have the funding, staffing, or capacity to thoroughly investigate every complaint it receives. That is why both systems are necessary.
Regulatory oversight and the civil justice system serve different but complementary functions. One should not replace the other.
When Florida’s “Free Kill” law and other legal barriers make accountability difficult or impossible, and regulatory complaints are closed without action, negligent providers escape accountability altogether. The result is a system in which wrongdoers face neither professional discipline nor civil consequences, allowing the immense financial costs of their negligence to be shifted entirely onto the public. This injustice leaves people without access to information about prior misconduct and makes it difficult to make fully informed healthcare decisions.
The result:
Hospitals and physicians who commit fatal medical negligence face no accountability. Their insurers avoid claims. The costs are shifted away from the wrongdoers and onto the American public. The wrongdoers move on. Families are left without recourse, without justice, and without answers.
Who the law abandons:
Victims 25 or Older
Adults 25 or older who are unmarried and without minor children are categorically excluded from non-economic damages—which represent the actual value of a human life—and are limited to economic damages only. By capping the value of a life, or non-economic damages, at $0, the law effectively makes it financially impossible to pursue justice and recover even the minimal economic damages it claims are available, such as funeral and autopsy expenses.
Unmarried Victims
This includes widows, widowers, divorced individuals, and those in committed relationships. When these victims die from medical negligence, their estates are restricted to economic damages only—a restriction intentionally designed to block legal accountability, shielding wrongdoers from the financial consequences of their own actions, shifting the immense costs onto the public, and denying families justice.
Victims Without Minor Children
Whether a family can seek justice depends entirely on if the deceased left behind minor children. If not, the law limits the estate to economic damages alone—arbitrarily valuing a human life based on family status rather than the harm caused, while intentionally protecting negligent providers from the true financial costs of their actions and shifting those burdens onto the public.
Economic Damages Only
The law claims families can recover economic damages such as funeral and autopsy expenses. In reality, fatal medical negligence cases have limited economic damages, making the cost of seeking justice and accountability far greater than the economic damages of a deceased victim. By stripping away real accountability, the system shifts the immense financial and emotional burdens of a stolen life entirely onto the public and surviving families. A right that cannot be exercised is not a viable right.
The Truth About Damage Caps: Protecting Liability, Blocking Justice
Whether it is a $0 cap for victims under Florida’s “Free Kill” law, a $200,000 limit for patients harmed in a hospital shielded by sovereign immunity, or any other artificial cap on non-economic damages, the true purpose of these restrictions is identical: they serve to make accessing justice a financial impossibility for many, while strictly limiting the financial liability of those who commit medical errors.
To understand why damage caps destroy accountability, it is vital to separate economic damages from non-economic damages. Economic damages are quantifiable costs that can be calculated on a spreadsheet—ongoing medical expenses, lost wages, and long-term specialized care. A wrongdoer being held responsible for the direct financial destruction they caused is the absolute bare minimum that should happen. True accountability for choosing to violate the minimum standard of care and causing catastrophic harm or death does not stop at a medical bill.
Non-economic damages represent the losses that cannot be tabulated by a mathematical formula or an insurance adjuster. There is no line item on a ledger for taking a human life. There is no invoice for leaving a gaping, permanent hole in a family. There is no financial calculation that can accurately measure the trauma of seriously harming a victim in a way that completely alters the life they lived before the medical malpractice occurred.
By capping these immearsurable damages at $0 or low arbitrary numbers, the state creates an impossible financial gauntlet. Because medical malpractice litigation requires tens of thousands of dollars in upfront expert fees, eliminating or severely restricting non-economic damages guarantees that families cannot afford to bring an action to court. Ultimately, these caps do not protect “access to care”—they protect the corporate bottom lines of insurance companies and negligent providers, while shifting the true human and financial cost directly onto suffering families and the American public.
The Truth About Damage Caps: Protecting Liability, Blocking Justice
Whether it is a $0 cap for victims under Florida’s “Free Kill” law, a $200,000 limit for patients harmed in a hospital shielded by sovereign immunity, or any other artificial cap on non-economic damages, the true purpose of these restrictions is identical: they serve to make accessing justice a financial impossibility for many while strictly limiting the financial liability of those who commit medical errors.
To understand why damage caps destroy accountability, it is vital to separate economic damages from non-economic damages. Economic damages are quantifiable costs like medical bills and lost wages. But true accountability for choosing to violate the standard of care and causing catastrophic harm or death does not stop at a medical bill.
Non-economic damages represent the losses that cannot be tabulated by a mathematical formula or an insurance adjuster. There is no line item on a ledger for taking a human life. There is no invoice for leaving a gaping, permanent hole in a family.
Who the law abandons:
$0
Strict Block
“Free Kill” Victims (Florida Statute 768.21)
The state legally values the lives of unmarried adults aged 25 or older without minor children at exactly $0. Surviving family members are completely barred from recovering pain and suffering damages, making the pursuit of legal accountability economically impossible.
$200,000
Liability Cap
Sovereign Immunity Limits
If medical negligence occurs inside a government-run, public, or state-funded healthcare facility, Florida caps the total recovery limit at an arbitrary $200,000.00—regardless of the level of permanent, catastrophic harm caused.
LIMITS
Financial Gauntlet
Arbitrary Damage Barriers
Malpractice litigation requires $50,000 to $100,000+ upfront for expert witness fees. When state laws impose arbitrary limits on non-economic damages, it guarantees that grieving families cannot afford to take highly insulated insurance companies to court.
- Unconstitutional Restrictions
The Evidence Is Clear
Damage caps replace jury decisions with arbitrary legal limits, reducing accountability and sometimes making access to justice impossible for victims and families.
Florida Supreme Court ruled caps unconstitutional — twice
Florida's highest court reviewed the evidence and struck down damage caps on two separate occasions, finding they violated equal protection and due process rights guaranteed under the Florida Constitution.
No evidence caps reduced insurance premiums
Proponents argued caps would lower malpractice insurance premiums for physicians. Caps were enforceable for over a decade. Courts found no evidence this occurred. Physicians did not see meaningful savings.
No proof caps stabilized the insurance market
The purported goal of market stabilization was never demonstrated. The legislative justification was found to be speculative rather than evidence-based.
Insurers did not pass savings to physicians
Even where insurers benefited from limited payouts, those savings were not passed on to physicians in the form of reduced premiums — undermining the entire stated rationale for caps.
The link between caps and lower costs was deemed speculative
Courts concluded that the connection between limiting damage awards and reducing healthcare costs or insurance premiums was purely speculative — not proven by data, not supported by evidence, and not a sufficient justification for stripping constitutional rights from injured patients and grieving families.
Damage caps punish the most severely injured
Damage caps are one-size-fits-all, but medical malpractice is not. The Court ruled caps unconstitutional because they inflict arbitrary, unequal burdens on victims. By slashing recovery below the high cost of complex litigation, these caps deter justice.
When Fundamental Constitutional Rights Become an Illusion
The public is harmed as well. When medical negligence cases are blocked from reaching the courts, patients lose access to one of the most important sources of transparency and accountability. Lawsuits uncover facts, create public records, compel testimony under oath, and allow families to learn what happened and why.
State licensing boards are not a substitute for access to the courts. According to the board’s
own reports, the overwhelming majority of complaints are closed without disciplinary action.
Even when a licensing board investigates a complaint, it cannot provide families with the same
answers, transparency, accountability, or court judgment that a medical negligence case can
produce.
Without access to the courts, the public may never learn the full extent of a provider’s history or
whether preventable harm has occurred before. As a result, patients cannot truly know a
doctor’s record or responsibly conduct due diligence when making healthcare decisions for
themselves and their families.
As a result, wrongdoers are protected, along with the financial interests of hospitals and medical
malpractice insurance companies. The costs of medical negligence are shifted to families,
private health insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, and taxpayers.
Before falling for the narrative that laws making justice and accountability difficult or impossible somehow protect “access to care”, ask yourself these questions:
What good are fundamental constitutional rights if laws like “free kill” or damage caps make them financially impossible to exercise?
When justice and accountability are strategically blocked, who is the system really protecting?
What good is “access to care” if it means you are risking your health or life with a doctor whose true safety record has been intentionally hidden from you?
The Myth of Frivolous Medical Malpractice Lawsuits
Florida Statute § 766.203 – Pre-Suit Investigation of Medical Negligence Claims
Florida law contains one of the nation’s strictest safeguards against frivolous medical malpractice lawsuits. Before filing suit, the claimant’s attorney must invest substantial time and money conducting a comprehensive pre-suit investigation and obtain a sworn affidavit from a physician in the same specialty stating the defendant departed from the applicable standard of care and that the negligence caused the patient’s injury or death.
The real problem in Florida is not a flood of frivolous lawsuits; it is an impossible gauntlet of statutory barriers. The stacking of intense pre-suit mandates, sovereign immunity caps, and the “Free Kill” law has made it financially unfeasible for families with legitimate, devastating claims to secure the accountability they are constitutionally owed
These requirements were created to stop meritless cases before they are ever even filed. The real problem in Florida is not frivolous lawsuits. The real problem is that layers of laws, including pre-suit investigation requirements, sovereign immunity protections, damage limitations, Florida’s “Free Kill” law, and other statutory barriers to accountability, make accountability and access to justice financially impossible for families with legitimate claims.
- The Hidden Cost of Blocked Accountability
Blocking Justice Shifts Costs to the American Public
A law that strategically blocks accountability by making it financially impossible does not eliminate the financial burden—it simply transfers it from the wrongdoer to the public, forcing everyday citizens to subsidize corporate negligence through higher health insurance premiums and increased taxes.
- YOUR VOICE IS NEEDED
Join the Movement. Get Involved.
Be the first to know how policy changes impact patient safety. We’ll send you regular updates, educational resources, and community insights—so you can stay informed and make your voice heard.
- Real-time legislative and policy updates
- Monthly movement insights and educational resources
- Community toolkits, impact stories, and advocacy guides
- A supportive network of advocates nationwide